Skip to main content
Project Unaligned
GenomeMethodologyThe MonolithMeasurementsProfile
0/14 surveys
Project Unaligned · political genome

Your Political Genome

Every instrument you complete bonds one rung of the strand below. 14 of them, each scored on its own — not a quiz score.

/* Node depth: a rung at a front crossing sits nearer the viewer than one at a back crossing. r.depth is +1..-1; ~4% either way is enough to read as depth and too little to read as inconsistent sizing. */Personality/* Node depth: a rung at a front crossing sits nearer the viewer than one at a back crossing. r.depth is +1..-1; ~4% either way is enough to read as depth and too little to read as inconsistent sizing. */Values/* Node depth: a rung at a front crossing sits nearer the viewer than one at a back crossing. r.depth is +1..-1; ~4% either way is enough to read as depth and too little to read as inconsistent sizing. */Rhetoric/* Node depth: a rung at a front crossing sits nearer the viewer than one at a back crossing. r.depth is +1..-1; ~4% either way is enough to read as depth and too little to read as inconsistent sizing. */Affect/* Node depth: a rung at a front crossing sits nearer the viewer than one at a back crossing. r.depth is +1..-1; ~4% either way is enough to read as depth and too little to read as inconsistent sizing. */Institutions/* Node depth: a rung at a front crossing sits nearer the viewer than one at a back crossing. r.depth is +1..-1; ~4% either way is enough to read as depth and too little to read as inconsistent sizing. */Trust/* Node depth: a rung at a front crossing sits nearer the viewer than one at a back crossing. r.depth is +1..-1; ~4% either way is enough to read as depth and too little to read as inconsistent sizing. */Disgust/* Node depth: a rung at a front crossing sits nearer the viewer than one at a back crossing. r.depth is +1..-1; ~4% either way is enough to read as depth and too little to read as inconsistent sizing. */Authoritarianism/* Node depth: a rung at a front crossing sits nearer the viewer than one at a back crossing. r.depth is +1..-1; ~4% either way is enough to read as depth and too little to read as inconsistent sizing. */Identity/* Node depth: a rung at a front crossing sits nearer the viewer than one at a back crossing. r.depth is +1..-1; ~4% either way is enough to read as depth and too little to read as inconsistent sizing. */Capital/* Node depth: a rung at a front crossing sits nearer the viewer than one at a back crossing. r.depth is +1..-1; ~4% either way is enough to read as depth and too little to read as inconsistent sizing. */Hierarchy/* Node depth: a rung at a front crossing sits nearer the viewer than one at a back crossing. r.depth is +1..-1; ~4% either way is enough to read as depth and too little to read as inconsistent sizing. */Attribution/* Node depth: a rung at a front crossing sits nearer the viewer than one at a back crossing. r.depth is +1..-1; ~4% either way is enough to read as depth and too little to read as inconsistent sizing. */Networks/* Node depth: a rung at a front crossing sits nearer the viewer than one at a back crossing. r.depth is +1..-1; ~4% either way is enough to read as depth and too little to read as inconsistent sizing. */Media
0%MODEL CONSTRUCTED
Layer 1 · Basic Dispositions
Layer 2 · Ideological Attitudes & Values
Layer 3 · Ideological Expressions
A relation needs two readings.

This is everything the model claims about how political thinking hangs together. One assessment opens none of it.

RELATIONS  31 drawn · 12 cited · 19 this project’s own
OPEN       none
READINGS  none recorded
published associationthis project’s hypothesis
GenomeMethodMonolithMeasuresProfile
Project Unaligned· Public prototype
MethodologyCase StudiesAboutCreditsPrivacyTerms